RX M 7900 GRE vs RTX 3050 8GB
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 7900 GRE | RTX 3050 8GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 8,206 | 3,640 | +125.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 74 | 44 | +68.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 45 | 25 | +80.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 25 | 14 | +78.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 19.5 | 9.1 | +114.7% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 224 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 169 | 130 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.9 | 3.6 | -19.4% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 35 | 11 | +218.2% |
- RX M 7900 GRE averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 25 fps — about 80% faster.
- RTX 3050 8GB draws less power (130W vs 169W).
Verdict: RX M 7900 GRE or RTX 3050 8GB?
RX M 7900 GRE advantages
- 1440p gaming (+44%)
- 4K gaming (+44%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+56%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- Local LLM inference (+69%)
RTX 3050 8GB advantages
- AI image generation (+19%)
- Power efficiency (+23%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 7900 GRE if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 3050 8GB if you run AI image generation locally.
- Choose the RX M 7900 GRE if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX M 7900 GRE vs RTX 3050 8GB: which should you choose?
RX M 7900 GRE — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 45 fps at 1440p.
RTX 3050 8GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Ampere) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 25 fps at 1440p; launched at $249.
RX M 7900 GRE vs RTX 3050 8GB: RX M 7900 GRE is faster for gaming. RX M 7900 GRE averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 25 fps — about 80% faster. RTX 3050 8GB draws less power (130W vs 169W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7900 GRE averages 45 fps against 25. At 4K (25 vs 14 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 3050 8GB is quicker for AI image generation (3.6 vs 2.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 169 W versus 130 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 7900 GRE better than the RTX 3050 8GB?
RX M 7900 GRE is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7900 GRE averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 25 fps — about 80% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 7900 GRE and the RTX 3050 8GB?
RX M 7900 GRE averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 25 fps — about 80% faster. RTX 3050 8GB draws less power (130W vs 169W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 7900 GRE if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 3050 8GB if you run AI image generation locally.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.