RX M 7700 XT vs RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 7700 XT | RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,274 | 2,695 | +132.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 61 | 37 | +64.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 37 | 21 | +76.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 20 | 11 | +81.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 | 7.7 | +94.0% |
| VRAM | 12 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 448 | -25.0% |
| TDP (W) | 159 | 129 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.2 | 3.1 | -29.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 26 | 22 | +18.2% |
- RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 76% faster.
- RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws less power (129W vs 159W).
Verdict: RX M 7700 XT or RTX 2070 Super Mobile?
RX M 7700 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+43%)
- 4K gaming (+45%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Local LLM inference (+15%)
RTX 2070 Super Mobile advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+25%)
- AI image generation (+29%)
- Power efficiency (+19%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 2070 Super Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX M 7700 XT vs RTX 2070 Super Mobile: which should you choose?
RX M 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 37 fps at 1440p.
RTX 2070 Super Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 21 fps at 1440p.
RX M 7700 XT vs RTX 2070 Super Mobile: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 76% faster. RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws less power (129W vs 159W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps against 21. At 4K (20 vs 11 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is quicker for AI image generation (3.1 vs 2.2 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (26 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 159 W versus 129 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 7700 XT better than the RTX 2070 Super Mobile?
RX M 7700 XT takes the overall edge, though RTX 2070 Super Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 76% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 7700 XT and the RTX 2070 Super Mobile?
RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 76% faster. RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws less power (129W vs 159W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 2070 Super Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.