RX M 7700 XT vs Pro WX 7100
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 7700 XT | Pro WX 7100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,274 | 2,005 | +212.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 61 | 33 | +84.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 37 | 18 | +105.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 20 | 10 | +100.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 | 5.7 | +160.7% |
| VRAM | 12 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 224 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 159 | 130 | — |
- RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 106% faster.
- Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 159W).
Verdict: RX M 7700 XT or Pro WX 7100?
RX M 7700 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+51%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+68%)
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
Pro WX 7100 advantages
- Power efficiency (+18%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX M 7700 XT vs Pro WX 7100: which should you choose?
RX M 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 37 fps at 1440p.
Pro WX 7100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.
RX M 7700 XT vs Pro WX 7100: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 106% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 159W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps against 18. At 4K (20 vs 10 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 159 W versus 130 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 7700 XT better than the Pro WX 7100?
RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 106% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 7700 XT and the Pro WX 7100?
RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 106% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 159W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.