Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 6500 XT vs L40S

Verdict
RX M 6500 XT vs L40S: L40S is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 6500 XTL40SDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,05832,060-93.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p33234-85.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p18148-87.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K1084-88.1%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.991.6-94.7%
VRAM4 GB GDDR648 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112864-87.0%
TDP (W)69350
  • L40S averages 148 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 88% faster.
  • RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 350W).

Verdict: RX M 6500 XT or L40S?

Our recommendation
L40S is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 6500 XT advantages

  • Power efficiency (+80%)

L40S advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+88%)
  • 4K gaming (+88%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+94%)
  • Video memory (+92%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+87%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the L40S if you game at 1440p.

RX M 6500 XT vs L40S: which should you choose?

RX M 6500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.

L40S — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 48 GB of GDDR6, averaging 148 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6500 XT vs L40S: L40S is faster for gaming. L40S averages 148 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 88% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 350W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the L40S averages 148 fps against 18. At 4K (10 vs 84 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 48GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 69 W versus 350 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 6500 XT better than the L40S?

L40S is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. L40S averages 148 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 88% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 6500 XT and the L40S?

L40S averages 148 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 88% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 350W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the L40S if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 6500 XT profile → L40S profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons