Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 6500 XT vs GTX 880M

Verdict
RX M 6500 XT vs GTX 880M: RX M 6500 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 6500 XTGTX 880MDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,0581,067+92.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3327+22.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1814+28.6%
Avg FPS @ 4K107+42.9%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.93.1+60.7%
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112160-30.0%
TDP (W)69103
  • RX M 6500 XT averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster.
  • RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 103W).

Verdict: RX M 6500 XT or GTX 880M?

Our recommendation
RX M 6500 XT takes the overall edge, though GTX 880M wins in specific areas worth weighing.

RX M 6500 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+22%)
  • 4K gaming (+30%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+48%)
  • Power efficiency (+33%)

GTX 880M advantages

  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+30%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 880M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M 6500 XT vs GTX 880M: which should you choose?

RX M 6500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.

GTX 880M — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Kepler) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6500 XT vs GTX 880M: RX M 6500 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 6500 XT averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 103W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6500 XT averages 18 fps against 14. At 4K (10 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 69 W versus 103 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 6500 XT better than the GTX 880M?

RX M 6500 XT takes the overall edge, though GTX 880M wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 6500 XT averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 6500 XT and the GTX 880M?

RX M 6500 XT averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster. RX M 6500 XT draws less power (69W vs 103W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 6500 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 880M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 6500 XT profile → GTX 880M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons