Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 6400 vs GTX 750 Mobile

Verdict
RX M 6400 vs GTX 750 Mobile: RX M 6400 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 6400GTX 750 MobileDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,272329+286.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2822+27.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1511+36.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K85+60.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.00.9+222.3%
VRAM4 GB GDDR61 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112112
TDP (W)3433
  • RX M 6400 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster.
  • GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 34W).

Verdict: RX M 6400 or GTX 750 Mobile?

Our recommendation
RX M 6400 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 6400 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+27%)
  • 4K gaming (+38%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+74%)
  • Video memory (+75%)

GTX 750 Mobile advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 6400 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RX M 6400 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M 6400 vs GTX 750 Mobile: which should you choose?

RX M 6400 — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.

GTX 750 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6400 vs GTX 750 Mobile: RX M 6400 is faster for gaming. RX M 6400 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster. GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 34W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6400 averages 15 fps against 11. At 4K (8 vs 5 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 1GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 34 W versus 33 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 6400 better than the GTX 750 Mobile?

RX M 6400 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6400 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 6400 and the GTX 750 Mobile?

RX M 6400 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 36% faster. GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 34W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 6400 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6400 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 6400 profile → GTX 750 Mobile profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons