RX M 560 vs Quadro M2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 560 | Quadro M2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 777 | 626 | +24.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 24 | +4.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 12 | +8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 6 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.2 | 1.8 | +24.0% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 112 | — |
| TDP (W) | 52 | 75 | — |
- RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
- RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 75W).
Verdict: RX M 560 or Quadro M2000?
RX M 560 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+19%)
- Power efficiency (+31%)
Quadro M2000 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 560 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
RX M 560 vs Quadro M2000: which should you choose?
RX M 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
RX M 560 vs Quadro M2000: RX M 560 is faster for gaming. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 560 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 6 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 52 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 560 better than the Quadro M2000?
RX M 560 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 560 and the Quadro M2000?
RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 560 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.