RX M 480 vs Quadro M4000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 480 | Quadro M4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,736 | 899 | +93.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 31 | 25 | +24.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 17 | 13 | +30.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 9 | 7 | +28.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.0 | 2.6 | +93.0% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 224 | — |
| TDP (W) | 97 | 120 | — |
- RX M 480 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster.
- RX M 480 draws less power (97W vs 120W).
Verdict: RX M 480 or Quadro M4000?
RX M 480 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+24%)
- 4K gaming (+22%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+48%)
- Power efficiency (+19%)
Quadro M4000 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 480 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 480 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX M 480 vs Quadro M4000: which should you choose?
RX M 480 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,050.
RX M 480 vs Quadro M4000: RX M 480 is faster for gaming. RX M 480 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster. RX M 480 draws less power (97W vs 120W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 480 averages 17 fps against 13. At 4K (9 vs 7 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 97 W versus 120 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 480 better than the Quadro M4000?
RX M 480 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 480 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 480 and the Quadro M4000?
RX M 480 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster. RX M 480 draws less power (97W vs 120W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 480 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 480 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.