RX M 480 vs Arc Pro A60M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 480 | Arc Pro A60M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,736 | 2,234 | -22.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 31 | 34 | -8.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 17 | 19 | -10.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 9 | 10 | -10.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.0 | 5.3 | -6.8% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 224 | — |
| TDP (W) | 97 | 95 | — |
- Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster.
- Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 97W).
Verdict: RX M 480 or Arc Pro A60M?
RX M 480 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Arc Pro A60M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+11%)
- 4K gaming (+10%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+22%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you game at 1440p.
RX M 480 vs Arc Pro A60M: which should you choose?
RX M 480 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p.
Arc Pro A60M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
RX M 480 vs Arc Pro A60M: Arc Pro A60M is faster for gaming. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 97W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps against 17. At 4K (9 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 97 W versus 95 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 480 better than the Arc Pro A60M?
Arc Pro A60M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 480 and the Arc Pro A60M?
Arc Pro A60M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 11% faster. Arc Pro A60M draws less power (95W vs 97W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc Pro A60M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.