RX M 460 vs RX M Vega 64
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 460 | RX M Vega 64 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 640 | 3,766 | -83.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 45 | -46.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 26 | -53.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 14 | -57.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 10.8 | -83.0% |
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 410 | -72.7% |
| TDP (W) | 48 | 191 | — |
- RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 54% faster.
- RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 191W).
Verdict: RX M 460 or RX M Vega 64?
RX M 460 advantages
- Power efficiency (+75%)
RX M Vega 64 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+54%)
- 4K gaming (+57%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+83%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+73%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.
RX M 460 vs RX M Vega 64: which should you choose?
RX M 460 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RX M Vega 64 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.
RX M 460 vs RX M Vega 64: RX M Vega 64 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 54% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 191W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 14 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 48 W versus 191 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 460 better than the RX M Vega 64?
RX M Vega 64 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 54% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 460 and the RX M Vega 64?
RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 54% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 191W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.