Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 460 vs RX M 470

Verdict
RX M 460 vs RX M 470: RX M 470 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 460RX M 470Difference
3DMark Time Spy6401,470-56.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2429-17.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1216-25.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K68-25.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.84.2-56.4%
VRAM2 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112224-50.0%
TDP (W)4878
  • RX M 470 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster.
  • RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 78W).

Verdict: RX M 460 or RX M 470?

Our recommendation
RX M 470 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 460 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+38%)

RX M 470 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+25%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+56%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 470 if you game at 1440p.

RX M 460 vs RX M 470: which should you choose?

RX M 460 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

RX M 470 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

RX M 460 vs RX M 470: RX M 470 is faster for gaming. RX M 470 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 78W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 470 averages 16 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 8 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 48 W versus 78 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 460 better than the RX M 470?

RX M 470 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 470 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 460 and the RX M 470?

RX M 470 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 78W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 470 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 460 profile → RX M 470 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons