Graphics Card Comparison

RX 7800 XT vs RX M 460

Verdict
RX 7800 XT vs RX M 460: RX 7800 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX 7800 XTRX M 460Difference
3DMark Time Spy7,837640+1,124.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p7224+200.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p4412+266.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K246+300.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)18.71.8+919.7%
VRAM16 GB GDDR62 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448112+300.0%
TDP (W)26348
  • RX 7800 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 267% faster.
  • RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 263W).

Verdict: RX 7800 XT or RX M 460?

Our recommendation
RX 7800 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX 7800 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+73%)
  • 4K gaming (+75%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+92%)
  • Video memory (+88%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+75%)

RX M 460 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+82%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX 7800 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX 7800 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX 7800 XT vs RX M 460: which should you choose?

RX 7800 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 44 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.

RX M 460 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

RX 7800 XT vs RX M 460: RX 7800 XT is faster for gaming. RX 7800 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 267% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 263W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 7800 XT averages 44 fps against 12. At 4K (24 vs 6 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 263 W versus 48 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 7800 XT better than the RX M 460?

RX 7800 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 7800 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 267% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX 7800 XT and the RX M 460?

RX 7800 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 267% faster. RX M 460 draws less power (48W vs 263W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX 7800 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 460 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX 7800 XT profile → RX M 460 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons