RX 7700 XT vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX 7700 XT | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,383 | 1,650 | +347.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 69 | 25 | +176.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 42 | 12 | +250.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 5 | +360.0% |
| VRAM | 12 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 68 | +391.9% |
| TDP (W) | 245 | 15 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.6 | 0.1 | +2,500.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 26 | 2 | +1,200.0% |
- RX 7700 XT averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 250% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 245W).
Verdict: RX 7700 XT or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX 7700 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+71%)
- 4K gaming (+78%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+78%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+80%)
- AI image generation (+96%)
- Local LLM inference (+92%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Power efficiency (+94%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX 7700 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX 7700 XT vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: which should you choose?
RX 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 42 fps at 1440p; launched at $449.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RX 7700 XT vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: RX 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX 7700 XT averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 250% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 245W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 7700 XT averages 42 fps against 12. At 4K (23 vs 5 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RX 7700 XT is quicker for AI image generation (2.6 vs 0.1 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (26 vs 2 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 245 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 7700 XT better than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 7700 XT averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 250% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX 7700 XT and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX 7700 XT averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 250% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 245W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX 7700 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.