RX 7600 XT vs RX 560
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX 7600 XT | RX 560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,737 | 913 | +418.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 51 | 26 | +96.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 30 | 13 | +130.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 16 | 7 | +128.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 11.3 | 2.6 | +332.2% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 112 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 190 | 80 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $329 | $99 | +232.3% |
- RX 7600 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 131% faster.
- RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 190W).
Verdict: RX 7600 XT or RX 560?
RX 7600 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+57%)
- 4K gaming (+56%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+81%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
RX 560 advantages
- Power efficiency (+58%)
- Affordability (+70%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX 7600 XT if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX 560 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX 7600 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
RX 7600 XT delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
RX 7600 XT vs RX 560: which should you choose?
RX 7600 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2024, RDNA 3) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 30 fps at 1440p; launched at $329.
RX 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $99.
RX 7600 XT vs RX 560: RX 7600 XT is faster for gaming. RX 7600 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 131% faster. RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 190W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 7600 XT averages 30 fps against 13. At 4K (16 vs 7 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 190 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $329 vs $99, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 7600 XT better than the RX 560?
RX 7600 XT takes the overall edge, though RX 560 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX 7600 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 131% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX 7600 XT and the RX 560?
RX 7600 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 131% faster. RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 190W).
Which is better value?
RX 7600 XT delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX 7600 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX 560 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.