RX 7600 XT vs Arc A770
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX 7600 XT | Arc A770 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,737 | 7,224 | -34.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 51 | 68 | -25.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 30 | 41 | -26.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 16 | 23 | -30.4% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 11.3 | 17.2 | -34.4% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 448 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 190 | 225 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.7 | 2.6 | -34.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 17 | 35 | -51.4% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $329 | $349 | -5.7% |
- Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 27% faster.
- RX 7600 XT draws less power (190W vs 225W).
Verdict: RX 7600 XT or Arc A770?
RX 7600 XT advantages
- Power efficiency (+16%)
- Affordability (+6%)
Arc A770 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+27%)
- 4K gaming (+30%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+34%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- AI image generation (+35%)
- Local LLM inference (+51%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX 7600 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX 7600 XT if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
RX 7600 XT vs Arc A770: which should you choose?
RX 7600 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2024, RDNA 3) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 30 fps at 1440p; launched at $329.
Arc A770 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RX 7600 XT vs Arc A770: Arc A770 is faster for gaming. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 27% faster. RX 7600 XT draws less power (190W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770 averages 41 fps against 30. At 4K (16 vs 23 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc A770 is quicker for AI image generation (2.6 vs 1.7 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 17 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 190 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $329 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 7600 XT better than the Arc A770?
Arc A770 takes the overall edge, though RX 7600 XT wins in specific areas worth weighing. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 27% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX 7600 XT and the Arc A770?
Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 27% faster. RX 7600 XT draws less power (190W vs 225W).
Which is better value?
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX 7600 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.