Graphics Card Comparison

RX 6750 XT vs GTX 660 Max-Q

Verdict
RX 6750 XT vs GTX 660 Max-Q: RX 6750 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX 6750 XTGTX 660 Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy5,590486+1,050.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p5723+147.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3412+183.3%
Avg FPS @ 4K186+200.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)13.31.4+857.6%
VRAM12 GB GDDR62 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)336168+100.0%
TDP (W)25063
  • RX 6750 XT averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 183% faster.
  • GTX 660 Max-Q draws less power (63W vs 250W).

Verdict: RX 6750 XT or GTX 660 Max-Q?

Our recommendation
RX 6750 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX 6750 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+65%)
  • 4K gaming (+67%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+91%)
  • Video memory (+83%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

GTX 660 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+75%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX 6750 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX 6750 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX 6750 XT vs GTX 660 Max-Q: which should you choose?

RX 6750 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 34 fps at 1440p; launched at $549.

GTX 660 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

RX 6750 XT vs GTX 660 Max-Q: RX 6750 XT is faster for gaming. RX 6750 XT averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 183% faster. GTX 660 Max-Q draws less power (63W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6750 XT averages 34 fps against 12. At 4K (18 vs 6 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 250 W versus 63 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6750 XT better than the GTX 660 Max-Q?

RX 6750 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 6750 XT averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 183% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX 6750 XT and the GTX 660 Max-Q?

RX 6750 XT averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 183% faster. GTX 660 Max-Q draws less power (63W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX 6750 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX 6750 XT profile → GTX 660 Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons