Graphics Card Comparison

RX 6500 XT vs Arc A570M

Verdict
RX 6500 XT vs Arc A570M: RX 6500 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX 6500 XTArc A570MDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,4232,234+8.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3634+5.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2019+5.3%
Avg FPS @ 4K1110+10.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.85.3+8.5%
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112224-50.0%
TDP (W)10775
  • RX 6500 XT averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 107W).

Verdict: RX 6500 XT or Arc A570M?

Our recommendation
RX 6500 XT takes the overall edge, though Arc A570M wins in specific areas worth weighing.

RX 6500 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+5%)
  • 4K gaming (+9%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+8%)

Arc A570M advantages

  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+30%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX 6500 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the RX 6500 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX 6500 XT vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?

RX 6500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $199.

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RX 6500 XT vs Arc A570M: RX 6500 XT is faster for gaming. RX 6500 XT averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 107W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6500 XT averages 20 fps against 19. At 4K (11 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 107 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6500 XT better than the Arc A570M?

RX 6500 XT takes the overall edge, though Arc A570M wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX 6500 XT averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX 6500 XT and the Arc A570M?

RX 6500 XT averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 107W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX 6500 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX 6500 XT profile → Arc A570M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons