Graphics Card Comparison

RX 6300M vs GTX 750 Mobile

Verdict
RX 6300M vs GTX 750 Mobile: RX 6300M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX 6300MGTX 750 MobileDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,144329+247.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2722+22.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1411+27.3%
Avg FPS @ 4K75+40.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.30.9+247.9%
VRAM2 GB GDDR61 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)64112-42.9%
TDP (W)2533
  • RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.
  • RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 33W).

Verdict: RX 6300M or GTX 750 Mobile?

Our recommendation
RX 6300M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX 6300M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+21%)
  • 4K gaming (+29%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+71%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+24%)

GTX 750 Mobile advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+43%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX 6300M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the RX 6300M if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX 6300M vs GTX 750 Mobile: which should you choose?

RX 6300M — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 2 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

GTX 750 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.

RX 6300M vs GTX 750 Mobile: RX 6300M is faster for gaming. RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 33W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6300M averages 14 fps against 11. At 4K (7 vs 5 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 1GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 25 W versus 33 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6300M better than the GTX 750 Mobile?

RX 6300M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX 6300M and the GTX 750 Mobile?

RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 33W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX 6300M if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX 6300M profile → GTX 750 Mobile profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons