Graphics Card Comparison

RX 5700 vs RX M Vega 64

Verdict
RX 5700 vs RX M Vega 64: RX M Vega 64 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX 5700RX M Vega 64Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,7823,766-26.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3845-15.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2226-15.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K1114-21.4%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)8.010.8-26.1%
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB HBM2
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448410+9.3%
TDP (W)180191
  • RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 22 fps — about 15% faster.
  • RX 5700 draws less power (180W vs 191W).

Verdict: RX 5700 or RX M Vega 64?

Our recommendation
RX M Vega 64 takes the overall edge, though RX 5700 wins in specific areas worth weighing.

RX 5700 advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+8%)
  • Power efficiency (+6%)

RX M Vega 64 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+15%)
  • 4K gaming (+21%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+26%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX 5700 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RX 5700 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

RX 5700 vs RX M Vega 64: which should you choose?

RX 5700 — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, RDNA 1) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 22 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

RX M Vega 64 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.

RX 5700 vs RX M Vega 64: RX M Vega 64 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 22 fps — about 15% faster. RX 5700 draws less power (180W vs 191W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps against 22. At 4K (11 vs 14 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 180 W versus 191 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 5700 better than the RX M Vega 64?

RX M Vega 64 takes the overall edge, though RX 5700 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 22 fps — about 15% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX 5700 and the RX M Vega 64?

RX M Vega 64 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 22 fps — about 15% faster. RX 5700 draws less power (180W vs 191W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX 5700 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX 5700 profile → RX M Vega 64 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons