RTX 5090 D V2 vs RX M 6700 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 5090 D V2 | RX M 6700 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 40,000 | 4,716 | +748.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 286 | 51 | +460.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 183 | 30 | +510.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 105 | 16 | +556.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 | 11.2 | +832.8% |
| VRAM | 24 GB GDDR7 | 12 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 1,344 | 336 | +300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 575 | 149 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 41.9 | 1.7 | +2,364.7% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 107 | 26 | +311.5% |
- RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 510% faster.
- RX M 6700 XT draws less power (149W vs 575W).
Verdict: RTX 5090 D V2 or RX M 6700 XT?
RTX 5090 D V2 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+84%)
- 4K gaming (+85%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+88%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
- AI image generation (+96%)
- Local LLM inference (+76%)
RX M 6700 XT advantages
- Power efficiency (+74%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 5090 D V2 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 6700 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5090 D V2 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RTX 5090 D V2 vs RX M 6700 XT: which should you choose?
RTX 5090 D V2 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 24 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $2,299.
RX M 6700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2021, RDNA 2) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 30 fps at 1440p.
RTX 5090 D V2 vs RX M 6700 XT: RTX 5090 D V2 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 510% faster. RX M 6700 XT draws less power (149W vs 575W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps against 30. At 4K (105 vs 16 fps) VRAM (24GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5090 D V2 is quicker for AI image generation (41.9 vs 1.7 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (107 vs 26 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 575 W versus 149 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 5090 D V2 better than the RX M 6700 XT?
RTX 5090 D V2 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 510% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 5090 D V2 and the RX M 6700 XT?
RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 510% faster. RX M 6700 XT draws less power (149W vs 575W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 5090 D V2 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6700 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.