RTX 4080 Max-Q vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 4080 Max-Q | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 13,644 | 7,224 | +88.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 110 | 68 | +61.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 69 | 41 | +68.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 39 | 23 | +69.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 34.1 | 17.2 | +98.3% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6X | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 | 448 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 144 | 225 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 13.6 | 2.6 | +423.1% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 53 | 35 | +51.4% |
- RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 68% faster.
- RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 225W).
Verdict: RTX 4080 Max-Q or Arc B750?
RTX 4080 Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+41%)
- 4K gaming (+41%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+47%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
- AI image generation (+81%)
- Local LLM inference (+34%)
- Power efficiency (+36%)
Arc B750 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RTX 4080 Max-Q vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
RTX 4080 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2022, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 69 fps at 1440p.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 4080 Max-Q vs Arc B750: RTX 4080 Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 68% faster. RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps against 41. At 4K (39 vs 23 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4080 Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (13.6 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (53 vs 35 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 144 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 4080 Max-Q better than the Arc B750?
RTX 4080 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 68% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4080 Max-Q and the Arc B750?
RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 41 fps — about 68% faster. RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.