RTX 4070 Ti Super vs Quadro K4000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 4070 Ti Super | Quadro K4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 17,640 | 434 | +3,964.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 137 | 22 | +522.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 86 | 11 | +681.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 49 | 6 | +716.7% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 | 1.2 | +3,456.5% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6X | 3 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 | 168 | +300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 285 | 80 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $799 | $1,269 | -37.0% |
- RTX 4070 Ti Super averages 86 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 682% faster.
- Quadro K4000 draws less power (80W vs 285W).
Verdict: RTX 4070 Ti Super or Quadro K4000?
RTX 4070 Ti Super advantages
- 1440p gaming (+87%)
- 4K gaming (+88%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+98%)
- Video memory (+81%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
- Affordability (+37%)
Quadro K4000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+72%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4070 Ti Super if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro K4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 4070 Ti Super if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
RTX 4070 Ti Super delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
RTX 4070 Ti Super vs Quadro K4000: which should you choose?
RTX 4070 Ti Super — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2024, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 86 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.
Quadro K4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,269.
RTX 4070 Ti Super vs Quadro K4000: RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster for gaming. RTX 4070 Ti Super averages 86 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 682% faster. Quadro K4000 draws less power (80W vs 285W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4070 Ti Super averages 86 fps against 11. At 4K (49 vs 6 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 285 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $799 vs $1,269, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 4070 Ti Super better than the Quadro K4000?
RTX 4070 Ti Super is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4070 Ti Super averages 86 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 682% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4070 Ti Super and the Quadro K4000?
RTX 4070 Ti Super averages 86 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 682% faster. Quadro K4000 draws less power (80W vs 285W).
Which is better value?
RTX 4070 Ti Super delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4070 Ti Super if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro K4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.