RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4080 Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX 4080 Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 8,824 | 13,644 | -35.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 78 | 110 | -29.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 48 | 69 | -30.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 27 | 39 | -30.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 22.1 | 34.1 | -35.3% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 672 | -66.7% |
| TDP (W) | 165 | 144 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 8.8 | 13.6 | -35.3% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 17 | 53 | -67.9% |
- RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 48 fps — about 30% faster.
- RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 165W).
Verdict: RTX 4060 Ti 16GB or RTX 4080 Max-Q?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
RTX 4080 Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+30%)
- 4K gaming (+31%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+35%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
- AI image generation (+35%)
- Local LLM inference (+68%)
- Power efficiency (+13%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4080 Max-Q: which should you choose?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 48 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.
RTX 4080 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2022, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 69 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4080 Max-Q: RTX 4080 Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 48 fps — about 30% faster. RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 165W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps against 48. At 4K (27 vs 39 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4080 Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (13.6 vs 8.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (53 vs 17 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 165 W versus 144 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than the RTX 4080 Max-Q?
RTX 4080 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 48 fps — about 30% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the RTX 4080 Max-Q?
RTX 4080 Max-Q averages 69 fps at 1440p versus 48 fps — about 30% faster. RTX 4080 Max-Q draws less power (144W vs 165W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4080 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.