RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile vs RX M 6800 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile | RX M 6800 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,500 | 7,400 | +1.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 70 | 69 | +1.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 42 | 42 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 23 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 18.8 | 17.6 | +6.4% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 448 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 99 | 195 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 7.5 | 2.6 | +188.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 17 | 35 | -51.4% |
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 42 fps — about 0% faster.
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile draws less power (99W vs 195W).
Verdict: RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile or RX M 6800 XT?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile advantages
- AI image generation (+65%)
- Power efficiency (+49%)
RX M 6800 XT advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- Local LLM inference (+51%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile if you run AI image generation locally.
- Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile vs RX M 6800 XT: which should you choose?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 42 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6800 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 42 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile vs RX M 6800 XT: RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile is faster for gaming. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 42 fps — about 0% faster. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile draws less power (99W vs 195W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile averages 42 fps against 42. At 4K (23 vs 23 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile is quicker for AI image generation (7.5 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 17 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 99 W versus 195 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile better than the RX M 6800 XT?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 42 fps — about 0% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile and the RX M 6800 XT?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile averages 42 fps at 1440p versus 42 fps — about 0% faster. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile draws less power (99W vs 195W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Mobile if you run AI image generation locally. Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.