RTX 3090 Max-Q vs BXT-32-1024 MC4
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 3090 Max-Q | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,707 | 4,500 | +137.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 91 | 65 | +40.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 56 | 38 | +47.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 31 | 15 | +106.7% |
| VRAM | 24 GB GDDR6X | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 1,008 | 102 | +884.4% |
| TDP (W) | 157 | 5 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 10.0 | 1.5 | +566.7% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 80 | 25 | +220.0% |
- RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 47% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 157W).
Verdict: RTX 3090 Max-Q or BXT-32-1024 MC4?
RTX 3090 Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+32%)
- 4K gaming (+52%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+58%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+90%)
- AI image generation (+85%)
- Local LLM inference (+69%)
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- Power efficiency (+97%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 3090 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 3090 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RTX 3090 Max-Q vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: which should you choose?
RTX 3090 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2020, Ampere) with 24 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 56 fps at 1440p.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
RTX 3090 Max-Q vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: RTX 3090 Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 47% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 157W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps against 38. At 4K (31 vs 15 fps) VRAM (24GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 3090 Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (10.0 vs 1.5 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (80 vs 25 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 157 W versus 5 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 3090 Max-Q better than the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
RTX 3090 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 47% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 3090 Max-Q and the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
RTX 3090 Max-Q averages 56 fps at 1440p versus 38 fps — about 47% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 157W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 3090 Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.