RTX 2080 Ti Mobile vs RX M 6800
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 2080 Ti Mobile | RX M 6800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,000 | 5,770 | -30.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 46 | 58 | -20.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 27 | 35 | -22.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 15 | 19 | -21.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 11.4 | 13.7 | -16.8% |
| VRAM | 11 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 616 | 448 | +37.5% |
| TDP (W) | 150 | 162 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 4.6 | 2.1 | +119.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 30 | 35 | -14.3% |
- RX M 6800 averages 35 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 23% faster.
- RTX 2080 Ti Mobile draws less power (150W vs 162W).
Verdict: RTX 2080 Ti Mobile or RX M 6800?
RTX 2080 Ti Mobile advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+27%)
- AI image generation (+54%)
- Power efficiency (+7%)
RX M 6800 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+23%)
- 4K gaming (+21%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+31%)
- Video memory (+31%)
- Local LLM inference (+14%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the RX M 6800 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile if you run AI image generation locally.
RTX 2080 Ti Mobile vs RX M 6800: which should you choose?
RTX 2080 Ti Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 11 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6800 — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 35 fps at 1440p.
RTX 2080 Ti Mobile vs RX M 6800: RX M 6800 is faster for gaming. RX M 6800 averages 35 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 23% faster. RTX 2080 Ti Mobile draws less power (150W vs 162W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6800 averages 35 fps against 27. At 4K (15 vs 19 fps) VRAM (11GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile is quicker for AI image generation (4.6 vs 2.1 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 30 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 150 W versus 162 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile better than the RX M 6800?
RX M 6800 takes the overall edge, though RTX 2080 Ti Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 6800 averages 35 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 23% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile and the RX M 6800?
RX M 6800 averages 35 fps at 1440p versus 27 fps — about 23% faster. RTX 2080 Ti Mobile draws less power (150W vs 162W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 2080 Ti Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX M 6800 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.