Graphics Card Comparison

RTX 2070 vs Arc A770M

Verdict
RTX 2070 vs Arc A770M: Arc A770M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRTX 2070Arc A770MDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,6116,140-57.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3760-38.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2136-41.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K1120-45.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)7.514.6-49.0%
VRAM8 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)448448
TDP (W)175135
Stable Diffusion (it/s)3.02.2+36.4%
LLM inference (tokens/s)2235-37.1%
  • Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 42% faster.
  • Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 175W).

Verdict: RTX 2070 or Arc A770M?

Our recommendation
Arc A770M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RTX 2070 advantages

  • AI image generation (+27%)

Arc A770M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+42%)
  • 4K gaming (+45%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Local LLM inference (+37%)
  • Power efficiency (+23%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RTX 2070 if you run AI image generation locally.
  • Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p.

RTX 2070 vs Arc A770M: which should you choose?

RTX 2070 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 21 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.

Arc A770M — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p.

RTX 2070 vs Arc A770M: Arc A770M is faster for gaming. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 42% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 175W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770M averages 36 fps against 21. At 4K (11 vs 20 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RTX 2070 is quicker for AI image generation (3.0 vs 2.2 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 175 W versus 135 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RTX 2070 better than the Arc A770M?

Arc A770M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 42% faster.

What is the main difference between the RTX 2070 and the Arc A770M?

Arc A770M averages 36 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 42% faster. Arc A770M draws less power (135W vs 175W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RTX 2070 if you run AI image generation locally. Choose the Arc A770M if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RTX 2070 profile → Arc A770M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons