RTX 2070 vs Arc A770
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 2070 | Arc A770 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,611 | 7,224 | -63.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 37 | 68 | -45.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 21 | 41 | -48.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 11 | 23 | -52.2% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 7.5 | 17.2 | -56.6% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 448 | — |
| TDP (W) | 175 | 225 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 3.0 | 2.6 | +15.4% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 35 | -37.1% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $499 | $349 | +43.0% |
- Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 49% faster.
- RTX 2070 draws less power (175W vs 225W).
Verdict: RTX 2070 or Arc A770?
RTX 2070 advantages
- AI image generation (+13%)
- Power efficiency (+22%)
Arc A770 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+49%)
- 4K gaming (+52%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+64%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Local LLM inference (+37%)
- Affordability (+30%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 2070 if you run AI image generation locally.
- Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 2070 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Value for money
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
RTX 2070 vs Arc A770: which should you choose?
RTX 2070 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 21 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.
Arc A770 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
RTX 2070 vs Arc A770: Arc A770 is faster for gaming. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 49% faster. RTX 2070 draws less power (175W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770 averages 41 fps against 21. At 4K (11 vs 23 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 2070 is quicker for AI image generation (3.0 vs 2.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (35 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 175 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $499 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 2070 better than the Arc A770?
Arc A770 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 49% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 2070 and the Arc A770?
Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 21 fps — about 49% faster. RTX 2070 draws less power (175W vs 225W).
Which is better value?
Arc A770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 2070 if you run AI image generation locally. Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.