Graphics Card Comparison

R9 M390X vs RX M 590

Verdict
R9 M390X vs RX M 590: RX M 590 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricR9 M390XRX M 590Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,4352,117-32.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2934-14.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1619-15.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K810-20.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.16.1-32.2%
VRAM4 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)160224-28.6%
TDP (W)125146
  • RX M 590 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 16% faster.
  • R9 M390X draws less power (125W vs 146W).

Verdict: R9 M390X or RX M 590?

Our recommendation
RX M 590 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

R9 M390X advantages

  • Power efficiency (+14%)

RX M 590 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+16%)
  • 4K gaming (+20%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+32%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+29%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the R9 M390X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 590 if you game at 1440p.

R9 M390X vs RX M 590: which should you choose?

R9 M390X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 1.0) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

RX M 590 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

R9 M390X vs RX M 590: RX M 590 is faster for gaming. RX M 590 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 16% faster. R9 M390X draws less power (125W vs 146W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 590 averages 19 fps against 16. At 4K (8 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 125 W versus 146 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the R9 M390X better than the RX M 590?

RX M 590 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 590 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 16% faster.

What is the main difference between the R9 M390X and the RX M 590?

RX M 590 averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 16% faster. R9 M390X draws less power (125W vs 146W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the R9 M390X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 590 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
R9 M390X profile → RX M 590 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons