Graphics Card Comparison

R9 M390X vs RX 6400

Verdict
R9 M390X vs RX 6400: R9 M390X is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricR9 M390XRX 6400Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,4351,499-4.3%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2929
Avg FPS @ 1440p1616
Avg FPS @ 4K88
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.13.6+14.8%
VRAM4 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)160112+42.9%
TDP (W)12553
  • R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster.
  • RX 6400 draws less power (53W vs 125W).

Verdict: R9 M390X or RX 6400?

Our recommendation
RX 6400 takes the overall edge, though R9 M390X wins in specific areas worth weighing.

R9 M390X advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+30%)

RX 6400 advantages

  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+4%)
  • Power efficiency (+58%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the R9 M390X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the RX 6400 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.

R9 M390X vs RX 6400: which should you choose?

R9 M390X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 1.0) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

RX 6400 — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p; launched at $159.

R9 M390X vs RX 6400: R9 M390X is faster for gaming. R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster. RX 6400 draws less power (53W vs 125W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 M390X averages 16 fps against 16. At 4K (8 vs 8 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 125 W versus 53 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the R9 M390X better than the RX 6400?

RX 6400 takes the overall edge, though R9 M390X wins in specific areas worth weighing. R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the R9 M390X and the RX 6400?

R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster. RX 6400 draws less power (53W vs 125W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the R9 M390X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX 6400 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
R9 M390X profile → RX 6400 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons