R9 M390X vs Quadro M2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | R9 M390X | Quadro M2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,435 | 626 | +129.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 29 | 24 | +20.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 16 | 12 | +33.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 6 | +33.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 4.1 | 1.8 | +129.1% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 160 | 112 | +42.9% |
| TDP (W) | 125 | 75 | — |
- R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster.
- Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 125W).
Verdict: R9 M390X or Quadro M2000?
R9 M390X advantages
- 1440p gaming (+25%)
- 4K gaming (+25%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+56%)
- Memory bandwidth (+30%)
Quadro M2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+40%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the R9 M390X if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the R9 M390X if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
R9 M390X vs Quadro M2000: which should you choose?
R9 M390X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 1.0) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
R9 M390X vs Quadro M2000: R9 M390X is faster for gaming. R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 125W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 M390X averages 16 fps against 12. At 4K (8 vs 6 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 125 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the R9 M390X better than the Quadro M2000?
R9 M390X is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster.
What is the main difference between the R9 M390X and the Quadro M2000?
R9 M390X averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 33% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 125W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the R9 M390X if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.