R9 M290X vs RX M 6700 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | R9 M290X | RX M 6700 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 805 | 4,716 | -82.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 51 | -51.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 30 | -56.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 16 | -56.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.3 | 11.2 | -79.5% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 12 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 154 | 336 | -54.2% |
| TDP (W) | 100 | 149 | — |
- RX M 6700 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 57% faster.
- R9 M290X draws less power (100W vs 149W).
Verdict: R9 M290X or RX M 6700 XT?
R9 M290X advantages
- Power efficiency (+33%)
RX M 6700 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+57%)
- 4K gaming (+56%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+83%)
- Video memory (+67%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the R9 M290X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 6700 XT if you game at 1440p.
R9 M290X vs RX M 6700 XT: which should you choose?
R9 M290X — AMD desktop graphics card (2014, GCN 1.0) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2021, RDNA 2) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 30 fps at 1440p.
R9 M290X vs RX M 6700 XT: RX M 6700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 6700 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 57% faster. R9 M290X draws less power (100W vs 149W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6700 XT averages 30 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 16 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 100 W versus 149 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the R9 M290X better than the RX M 6700 XT?
RX M 6700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6700 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 57% faster.
What is the main difference between the R9 M290X and the RX M 6700 XT?
RX M 6700 XT averages 30 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 57% faster. R9 M290X draws less power (100W vs 149W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the R9 M290X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6700 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.