R9 Fury X vs Quadro P2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | R9 Fury X | Quadro P2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,010 | 1,053 | +185.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 40 | 27 | +48.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 23 | 14 | +64.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 12 | 7 | +71.4% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 8.6 | 3.0 | +185.7% |
| VRAM | 4 GB HBM | 5 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 512 | 140 | +265.7% |
| TDP (W) | 275 | 75 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $649 | $450 | +44.2% |
- R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 64% faster.
- Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
Verdict: R9 Fury X or Quadro P2000?
R9 Fury X advantages
- 1440p gaming (+39%)
- 4K gaming (+42%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+65%)
- Memory bandwidth (+73%)
Quadro P2000 advantages
- Video memory (+20%)
- Power efficiency (+73%)
- Affordability (+31%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro P2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
R9 Fury X delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
R9 Fury X vs Quadro P2000: which should you choose?
R9 Fury X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 23 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.
Quadro P2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 5 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $450.
R9 Fury X vs Quadro P2000: R9 Fury X is faster for gaming. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 64% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 Fury X averages 23 fps against 14. At 4K (12 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 5GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 275 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $649 vs $450, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the R9 Fury X better than the Quadro P2000?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 64% faster.
What is the main difference between the R9 Fury X and the Quadro P2000?
R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 64% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
Which is better value?
R9 Fury X delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro P2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.