R9 Fury X vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | R9 Fury X | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,010 | 7,224 | -58.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 40 | 68 | -41.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 23 | 41 | -43.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 12 | 23 | -47.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 8.6 | 17.2 | -50.0% |
| VRAM | 4 GB HBM | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 512 | 448 | +14.3% |
| TDP (W) | 275 | 225 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $649 | $349 | +86.0% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 44% faster.
- Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 275W).
Verdict: R9 Fury X or Arc B750?
R9 Fury X advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+13%)
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+44%)
- 4K gaming (+48%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+58%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Power efficiency (+18%)
- Affordability (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the R9 Fury X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
R9 Fury X vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
R9 Fury X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 23 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
R9 Fury X vs Arc B750: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 44% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 275W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 23. At 4K (12 vs 23 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 275 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $649 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the R9 Fury X better than the Arc B750?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 44% faster.
What is the main difference between the R9 Fury X and the Arc B750?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 44% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 275W).
Which is better value?
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the R9 Fury X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.