Graphics Card Comparison

R9 Fury X vs Arc A570M

Verdict
R9 Fury X vs Arc A570M: R9 Fury X is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricR9 Fury XArc A570MDifference
3DMark Time Spy3,0102,234+34.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4034+17.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2319+21.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K1210+20.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)8.65.3+61.7%
VRAM4 GB HBM8 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)512224+128.6%
TDP (W)27575
  • R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 275W).

Verdict: R9 Fury X or Arc A570M?

Our recommendation
R9 Fury X takes the overall edge, though Arc A570M wins in specific areas worth weighing.

R9 Fury X advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+17%)
  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+26%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+56%)

Arc A570M advantages

  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+73%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

R9 Fury X vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?

R9 Fury X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 23 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

R9 Fury X vs Arc A570M: R9 Fury X is faster for gaming. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 275W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 Fury X averages 23 fps against 19. At 4K (12 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 275 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the R9 Fury X better than the Arc A570M?

R9 Fury X takes the overall edge, though Arc A570M wins in specific areas worth weighing. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster.

What is the main difference between the R9 Fury X and the Arc A570M?

R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 275W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
R9 Fury X profile → Arc A570M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons