Quadro RTX 8000 vs VII
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro RTX 8000 | VII | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,708 | 4,704 | +21.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 58 | 51 | +13.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 34 | 30 | +13.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 19 | 16 | +18.8% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 16.3 | 13.4 | +21.4% |
| VRAM | 48 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 | 1,024 | -34.4% |
| TDP (W) | 295 | 300 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 6.5 | 2.0 | +225.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 53 | 81 | -34.6% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $5,500 | $699 | +686.8% |
- Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 13% faster.
- Quadro RTX 8000 draws less power (295W vs 300W).
Verdict: Quadro RTX 8000 or VII?
Quadro RTX 8000 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+12%)
- 4K gaming (+16%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+18%)
- Video memory (+67%)
- AI image generation (+69%)
VII advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+34%)
- Local LLM inference (+35%)
- Affordability (+87%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the VII if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
VII delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs VII: which should you choose?
Quadro RTX 8000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 48 GB of GDDR6, averaging 34 fps at 1440p; launched at $5,500.
VII — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, Vega 20) with 16 GB of HBM2, averaging 30 fps at 1440p; launched at $699.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs VII: Quadro RTX 8000 is faster for gaming. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 13% faster. Quadro RTX 8000 draws less power (295W vs 300W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps against 30. At 4K (19 vs 16 fps) VRAM (48GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Quadro RTX 8000 is quicker for AI image generation (6.5 vs 2.0 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (81 vs 53 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 295 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $5,500 vs $699, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro RTX 8000 better than the VII?
Quadro RTX 8000 takes the overall edge, though VII wins in specific areas worth weighing. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 13% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro RTX 8000 and the VII?
Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 30 fps — about 13% faster. Quadro RTX 8000 draws less power (295W vs 300W).
Which is better value?
VII delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if you game at 1440p. Choose the VII if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.