Quadro RTX 6000 vs RTX 5080 Super
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro RTX 6000 | RTX 5080 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 5,708 | 22,512 | -74.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 58 | 170 | -65.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 34 | 107 | -68.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 19 | 61 | -68.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 16.3 | 56.3 | -71.0% |
| VRAM | 24 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 | 896 | -25.0% |
| TDP (W) | 295 | 415 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 6.5 | 22.5 | -71.1% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 53 | 71 | -25.4% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $4,000 | $999 | +300.4% |
- RTX 5080 Super averages 107 fps at 1440p versus 34 fps — about 68% faster.
- Quadro RTX 6000 draws less power (295W vs 415W).
Verdict: Quadro RTX 6000 or RTX 5080 Super?
Quadro RTX 6000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+29%)
RTX 5080 Super advantages
- 1440p gaming (+68%)
- 4K gaming (+69%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+25%)
- AI image generation (+71%)
- Local LLM inference (+25%)
- Affordability (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro RTX 6000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5080 Super if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
RTX 5080 Super delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs RTX 5080 Super: which should you choose?
Quadro RTX 6000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 34 fps at 1440p; launched at $4,000.
RTX 5080 Super — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2026, Blackwell) with 24 GB of GDDR7, averaging 107 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs RTX 5080 Super: RTX 5080 Super is faster for gaming. RTX 5080 Super averages 107 fps at 1440p versus 34 fps — about 68% faster. Quadro RTX 6000 draws less power (295W vs 415W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5080 Super averages 107 fps against 34. At 4K (19 vs 61 fps) VRAM (24GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5080 Super is quicker for AI image generation (22.5 vs 6.5 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (71 vs 53 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 295 W versus 415 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $4,000 vs $999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro RTX 6000 better than the RTX 5080 Super?
RTX 5080 Super is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5080 Super averages 107 fps at 1440p versus 34 fps — about 68% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro RTX 6000 and the RTX 5080 Super?
RTX 5080 Super averages 107 fps at 1440p versus 34 fps — about 68% faster. Quadro RTX 6000 draws less power (295W vs 415W).
Which is better value?
RTX 5080 Super delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro RTX 6000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5080 Super if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.