Quadro P5000 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro P5000 | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,104 | 4,500 | -31.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 40 | 65 | -38.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 23 | 38 | -39.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 12 | 15 | -20.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR5X | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 320 | 102 | +212.5% |
| TDP (W) | 180 | 5 | — |
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 39% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 180W).
Verdict: Quadro P5000 or BXT-32-1024 MC4?
Quadro P5000 advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+68%)
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+39%)
- 4K gaming (+20%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+31%)
- Power efficiency (+97%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro P5000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro P5000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Quadro P5000 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: which should you choose?
Quadro P5000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Pascal) with 16 GB of GDDR5X, averaging 23 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,900.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
Quadro P5000 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: BXT-32-1024 MC4 is faster for gaming. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 39% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 180W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps against 23. At 4K (12 vs 15 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 180 W versus 5 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro P5000 better than the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 takes the overall edge, though Quadro P5000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 39% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro P5000 and the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 23 fps — about 39% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 180W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro P5000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.