Graphics Card Comparison

Quadro P4000 vs GTX 1660 Mobile

Verdict
Quadro P4000 vs GTX 1660 Mobile: Quadro P4000 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricQuadro P4000GTX 1660 MobileDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,8551,494+24.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3229+10.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1816+12.5%
Avg FPS @ 4K98+12.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.34.3+24.1%
VRAM8 GB GDDR56 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224168+33.3%
TDP (W)10572
  • Quadro P4000 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 13% faster.
  • GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 105W).

Verdict: Quadro P4000 or GTX 1660 Mobile?

Our recommendation
Quadro P4000 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Quadro P4000 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+11%)
  • 4K gaming (+11%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+19%)
  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)

GTX 1660 Mobile advantages

  • Power efficiency (+31%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Quadro P4000 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Quadro P4000 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Quadro P4000 vs GTX 1660 Mobile: which should you choose?

Quadro P4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $850.

GTX 1660 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

Quadro P4000 vs GTX 1660 Mobile: Quadro P4000 is faster for gaming. Quadro P4000 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 13% faster. GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 105W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro P4000 averages 18 fps against 16. At 4K (9 vs 8 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 105 W versus 72 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Quadro P4000 better than the GTX 1660 Mobile?

Quadro P4000 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Quadro P4000 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 13% faster.

What is the main difference between the Quadro P4000 and the GTX 1660 Mobile?

Quadro P4000 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 13% faster. GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 105W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Quadro P4000 if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Quadro P4000 profile → GTX 1660 Mobile profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons