Quadro P2000 vs RX 590
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro P2000 | RX 590 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,053 | 2,492 | -57.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 27 | 36 | -25.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 20 | -30.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 11 | -36.4% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.0 | 7.1 | -57.7% |
| VRAM | 5 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 140 | 224 | -37.5% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 225 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $450 | $279 | +61.3% |
- RX 590 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 30% faster.
- Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
Verdict: Quadro P2000 or RX 590?
Quadro P2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+67%)
RX 590 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+30%)
- 4K gaming (+36%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+58%)
- Video memory (+38%)
- Memory bandwidth (+38%)
- Affordability (+38%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro P2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX 590 if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
RX 590 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro P2000 vs RX 590: which should you choose?
Quadro P2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 5 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $450.
RX 590 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $279.
Quadro P2000 vs RX 590: RX 590 is faster for gaming. RX 590 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 30% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 590 averages 20 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 11 fps) VRAM (5GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $450 vs $279, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro P2000 better than the RX 590?
RX 590 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 590 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 30% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro P2000 and the RX 590?
RX 590 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 30% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
Which is better value?
RX 590 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro P2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX 590 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.