Quadro P2000 vs HD 7770
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro P2000 | HD 7770 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,053 | 448 | +135.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 27 | 22 | +22.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 11 | +27.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 6 | +16.7% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.0 | 1.3 | +135.2% |
| VRAM | 5 GB GDDR5 | 1 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 140 | 112 | +25.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 80 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $450 | $159 | +183.0% |
- Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.
- Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 80W).
Verdict: Quadro P2000 or HD 7770?
Quadro P2000 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+21%)
- 4K gaming (+14%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
- Video memory (+80%)
- Memory bandwidth (+20%)
- Power efficiency (+6%)
HD 7770 advantages
- Affordability (+65%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro P2000 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the HD 7770 if you want the better price for the performance.
- Choose the Quadro P2000 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
HD 7770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro P2000 vs HD 7770: which should you choose?
Quadro P2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 5 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $450.
HD 7770 — AMD desktop graphics card (2012, GCN 1.0) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $159.
Quadro P2000 vs HD 7770: Quadro P2000 is faster for gaming. Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 80W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps against 11. At 4K (7 vs 6 fps) VRAM (5GB vs 1GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $450 vs $159, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro P2000 better than the HD 7770?
Quadro P2000 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro P2000 and the HD 7770?
Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. Quadro P2000 draws less power (75W vs 80W).
Which is better value?
HD 7770 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro P2000 if you game at 1440p. Choose the HD 7770 if you want the better price for the performance.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.