Quadro M4000 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro M4000 | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 899 | 8,824 | -89.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 78 | -67.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 48 | -72.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 27 | -74.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.6 | 22.1 | -88.3% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 224 | — |
| TDP (W) | 120 | 165 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $1,050 | $499 | +110.4% |
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 73% faster.
- Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
Verdict: Quadro M4000 or RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
Quadro M4000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+27%)
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB advantages
- 1440p gaming (+73%)
- 4K gaming (+74%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Affordability (+52%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro M4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro M4000 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: which should you choose?
Quadro M4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,050.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 48 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.
Quadro M4000 vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is faster for gaming. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 73% faster. Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 27 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 120 W versus 165 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $1,050 vs $499, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro M4000 better than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 73% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro M4000 and the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 48 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 73% faster. Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
Which is better value?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro M4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.