Quadro M2000 vs Voodoo5 5500
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro M2000 | Voodoo5 5500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 66 MB SDR | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 5 | +2,001.3% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 60 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $550 | $299 | +83.9% |
- These GPUs come from different eras (2016 vs 2000), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Voodoo5 5500?
Quadro M2000 advantages
- Video memory (+98%)
- Memory bandwidth (+95%)
Voodoo5 5500 advantages
- Power efficiency (+20%)
- Affordability (+46%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Voodoo5 5500 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Quadro M2000 vs Voodoo5 5500: which should you choose?
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
Voodoo5 5500 — 3dfx desktop graphics card (2000, VSA-100) with 66 MB of SDR; launched at $299.
Quadro M2000 vs Voodoo5 5500: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (2016 vs 2000), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: Quadro M2000 (2016, Desktop) and Voodoo5 5500 (2000, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
Quadro M2000 carries 4 GB of GDDR5 against 66 MB of SDR on Voodoo5 5500, with board powers of 75 W and 60 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Voodoo5 5500?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. These GPUs come from different eras (2016 vs 2000), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Voodoo5 5500?
These GPUs come from different eras (2016 vs 2000), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Voodoo5 5500 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.