Graphics Card Comparison

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla P40

Verdict
Quadro M2000 vs Tesla P40: Tesla P40 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricQuadro M2000Tesla P40Difference
3DMark Time Spy6264,116-84.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2447-48.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1227-55.6%
Avg FPS @ 4K615-60.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.811.8-84.8%
VRAM4 GB GDDR524 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112346-67.6%
TDP (W)75250
  • Tesla P40 averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 56% faster.
  • Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 250W).

Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Tesla P40?

Our recommendation
Tesla P40 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Quadro M2000 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+70%)

Tesla P40 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+56%)
  • 4K gaming (+60%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+85%)
  • Video memory (+83%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+68%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Tesla P40 if you game at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla P40: which should you choose?

Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.

Tesla P40 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Pascal) with 24 GB of GDDR5, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla P40: Tesla P40 is faster for gaming. Tesla P40 averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 56% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Tesla P40 averages 27 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 15 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Tesla P40?

Tesla P40 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Tesla P40 averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 56% faster.

What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Tesla P40?

Tesla P40 averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 56% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Tesla P40 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Quadro M2000 profile → Tesla P40 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons