Graphics Card Comparison

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla M60

Verdict
Quadro M2000 vs Tesla M60: Tesla M60 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricQuadro M2000Tesla M60Difference
3DMark Time Spy6263,377-81.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2442-42.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1224-50.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K613-53.8%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.89.7-81.5%
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112320-65.0%
TDP (W)75300
  • Tesla M60 averages 24 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 50% faster.
  • Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 300W).

Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Tesla M60?

Our recommendation
Tesla M60 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Quadro M2000 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+75%)

Tesla M60 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+50%)
  • 4K gaming (+54%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+81%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+65%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Tesla M60 if you game at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla M60: which should you choose?

Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.

Tesla M60 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 16 GB of GDDR5, averaging 24 fps at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla M60: Tesla M60 is faster for gaming. Tesla M60 averages 24 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 50% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 300W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Tesla M60 averages 24 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 13 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Tesla M60?

Tesla M60 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Tesla M60 averages 24 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 50% faster.

What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Tesla M60?

Tesla M60 averages 24 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 50% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 300W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Tesla M60 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Quadro M2000 profile → Tesla M60 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons