Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K40
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro M2000 | Tesla K40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 626 | 1,764 | -64.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 31 | -22.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 17 | -29.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 9 | -33.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 5.0 | -64.5% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 12 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 288 | -61.1% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 235 | — |
- Tesla K40 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 29% faster.
- Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 235W).
Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Tesla K40?
Quadro M2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+68%)
Tesla K40 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+29%)
- 4K gaming (+33%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+65%)
- Video memory (+67%)
- Memory bandwidth (+61%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Tesla K40 if you game at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K40: which should you choose?
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
Tesla K40 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 12 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K40: Tesla K40 is faster for gaming. Tesla K40 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 29% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 235W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Tesla K40 averages 17 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 9 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 235 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Tesla K40?
Tesla K40 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Tesla K40 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 29% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Tesla K40?
Tesla K40 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 29% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 235W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Tesla K40 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.