Quadro M2000 vs RX 6300M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro M2000 | RX 6300M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 626 | 1,144 | -45.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 27 | -11.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 14 | -14.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 7 | -14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 3.3 | -45.3% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 64 | +75.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 25 | — |
- RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 14% faster.
- RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 75W).
Verdict: Quadro M2000 or RX 6300M?
Quadro M2000 advantages
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+43%)
RX 6300M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+14%)
- 4K gaming (+14%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+45%)
- Power efficiency (+67%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the RX 6300M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro M2000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Quadro M2000 vs RX 6300M: which should you choose?
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
RX 6300M — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 2 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 vs RX 6300M: RX 6300M is faster for gaming. RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 14% faster. RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6300M averages 14 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 25 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro M2000 better than the RX 6300M?
RX 6300M takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 14% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the RX 6300M?
RX 6300M averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 14% faster. RX 6300M draws less power (25W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the RX 6300M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.