Graphics Card Comparison

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon 780M

Verdict
Quadro M2000 vs Radeon 780M: Radeon 780M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricQuadro M2000Radeon 780MDifference
3DMark Time Spy6263,100-79.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2445-46.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1225-52.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K610-40.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.80.1+1,276.9%
VRAM4 GB GDDR50 MB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112102+9.4%
TDP (W)7515
  • Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 52% faster.
  • Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 75W).

Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Radeon 780M?

Our recommendation
Radeon 780M takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Quadro M2000 advantages

  • Video memory (+100%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+9%)

Radeon 780M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+52%)
  • 4K gaming (+40%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+80%)
  • Power efficiency (+80%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the Radeon 780M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon 780M: which should you choose?

Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.

Radeon 780M — AMD integrated graphics processor (2023, RDNA 3.0) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 25 fps at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon 780M: Radeon 780M is faster for gaming. Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 52% faster. Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 75W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Radeon 780M averages 25 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Radeon 780M?

Radeon 780M takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 52% faster.

What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Radeon 780M?

Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 52% faster. Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 75W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Radeon 780M if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Quadro M2000 profile → Radeon 780M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons