Quadro M2000 vs Arc A570M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro M2000 | Arc A570M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 626 | 2,234 | -72.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 34 | -29.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 19 | -36.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 10 | -40.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 5.3 | -66.4% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 224 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 75 | — |
- Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 37% faster.
Verdict: Quadro M2000 or Arc A570M?
Quadro M2000 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Arc A570M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+37%)
- 4K gaming (+40%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+72%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?
Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
Quadro M2000 vs Arc A570M: Arc A570M is faster for gaming. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 37% faster.
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A570M averages 19 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 10 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro M2000 better than the Arc A570M?
Arc A570M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 37% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the Arc A570M?
Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 37% faster.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.