Quadro K4000 vs RX M 560
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro K4000 | RX M 560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 434 | 777 | -44.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 22 | 25 | -12.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 11 | 13 | -15.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 6 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 | 2.2 | -44.1% |
| VRAM | 3 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 112 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 80 | 52 | — |
- RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 15% faster.
- RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 80W).
Verdict: Quadro K4000 or RX M 560?
Quadro K4000 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
RX M 560 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+15%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+44%)
- Video memory (+25%)
- Power efficiency (+35%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro K4000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
Quadro K4000 vs RX M 560: which should you choose?
Quadro K4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,269.
RX M 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Quadro K4000 vs RX M 560: RX M 560 is faster for gaming. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 15% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 80W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 560 averages 13 fps against 11. At 4K (6 vs 6 fps) VRAM (3GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 80 W versus 52 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro K4000 better than the RX M 560?
RX M 560 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 15% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro K4000 and the RX M 560?
RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 15% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 80W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro K4000 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.